Legal Opinion

Payne v. Pullan

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1919No. Civ. No. 2918PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, refusing to vacate a default judgment. Edmund P. Mogan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from an order refusing io vacate a judgment taken by default in an action in unlawful detainer. The complaint was filed on December 14, 1915, and two days later an order was made directing service of summons upon the defendant by publication for three days, the ground of such order being that the defendant was concealing herself in order to avoid being served with summons. On December 24, 1915, the defendant, appearing specially for the purpose, served and filed a notice of motion to quash such service of summons, basing the motion upon the ground that at the time of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simon v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Security Loan & Trust Co. v. Boston & South Riverside Fruit Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Mantel v. MantelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Pingree Cattle Loan Co. v. Charles J. Webb & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Russell v. LandauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Oppenheimer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Slack v. SlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API