Legal Opinion
Lucky Auto Supply v. Turner
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 16, 1966No. Civ. 28638PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *
Appeal by the defendants and cross-appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for damages for violation of a right under a written license agreement to occupy real property.
Plaintiff, a California corporation, for more than 20 years last past, has been engaged in the business of selling automobile supplies, accessories and other merchandise some of which is heavy, and some of which is bulky such as automobile engines, tires, batteries, bicycles and large toy wagons. It operates 24 stores at different locations in southern and central California.
On April 27, 1954, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Edwards v. Container Kraft Carton & Paper Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Guttinger v. Calaveras Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Estate of WessonMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Lewis Jorge Construction Management, Inc. v. Pomona Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Dinosaur Development, Inc. v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.