Legal Opinion

Roberson v. Bondurant

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1937No. 4202PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSPETH, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, appellee here, for the sum of $703.52, balance found to be due under a written contract for the sale of cotton during the year 1930. Pleadings consist of an amended complaint, to which is attached a copy of the written contract sued upon, answer, and reply. Both parties submitted proposed findings of fact. The court later made up his own findings.

Under the issues made by the pleadings, there is only one item in dispute as to the cotton delivered under the contract. That is a bale of cotton, No. 2315,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Maloney Tank Mfg. Co. v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. Mitchell v. McCutcheonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hansche v. A. J. Conroy, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  4. James v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Associated Oil Co. v. La BranchOregon Supreme Court · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kutz Canon Oil & Gas Co. v. HarrNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Southwestern Portland Cement v. BeaversNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API