Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. McCutcheon

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1927No. 2963PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WATSON, J.

The judgment appealed from sustained liens claimed by appellees upon appellant’s mining' claims for labor performed at the instance .of appellant’s lessee, foreclosed the liens, and ordered sale of the property.

The first questions presented require construction of our lien statute as applicable to labor performed on mining claims, at the instance of a lessee. As we understand appellant’s contentions, they are (1) that a lessee is not to be considered an “other person having charge of any mining,” who, under Code 1915, § 3319, is to “be held to be the agent of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Golden Giant Mining Co. v. HillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Albuquerque Lumber Co. v. Tomei Et Ux.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Garcia v. SilvaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Ripley v. Cochiti Gold Mining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Morris v. MerchantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Scott v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. WeberNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Hydro Resources Corp. v. GrayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. RhodesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API