Legal Opinion
James v. Anderson
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 6, 1935No. 4069PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUDSPETH, Justice.
The appellants filed suit for an accounting and injunction and for possession of the Barney group of lode mining claims in the Eureka mining district, Hidalgo county, on the 18th day of January, 1934, basing their claim upon the following document :
“Hachita, N. M. Jan. 28, ’32
“We the owners of the Barney Group of gold claims, i. e. (M. T. Anderson and John Mitchell) agree to give J. A. James and H. W. Flynt an option to purchase the said group of claims for ten thousand dollars and to work the said property for five years under the following conditions: To start work inside…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
- Meagher v. ReedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Daily v. FitzgeraldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
- Algodones Land & Town Co. v. FrankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
- Cherokee Construction Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Alexander v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Scott v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Northcutt v. McPhersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Winn v. ShugartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Federal Land Bank of Wichita v. BeckNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.