Legal Opinion

Hansche v. A. J. Conroy, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1936PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The appellant is engaged in the wholesale commercial produce business, dealing in fruit and produce for consumption. It never dealt in sprouted onion sets, which are sold only for planting purposes and in the trade are regarded a specialty. Fred Schulz was in the employ of the appellant as a salesman, but occasionally made purchases of such farm produce dealt in by appellant company. He had never been authorized by his employer tO' buy onion sets on its behalf or to engage in that business in his own behalf or for others while working for appellant.

There is no testimony that the appellant had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McDermott v. JacksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. MoonMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Voell v. KleinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Domasek v. KluckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Pluto Powder Co. v. Cuba City State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pamperin v. Trinity Memorial HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ivers & Pond Piano Co. v. PeckhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Iowa National Mutual Insurance v. BackensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Mattice v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Everlite Manufacturing Co. v. Grand Valley MacHine & Tool Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API