Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Shenman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 12, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Claimant received unemployment insurance benefits for several months in 1997 and 1999. The record discloses that while he was receiving benefits,, claimant was working on certain projects as a freelance writer/public relations consultant. *853Claimant received monetary compensation for some of this work, as evidenced by his reporting the proceeds as income on his 1997 tax return and his taking deductions for business expenses incurred while performing this work on both his 1997 and 1999 tax returns. These work-related activities, while considered minimal by claimant, are sufficient to constitute…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of KaganovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of QuarantilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Claim of BryantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Claim of LentiniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of SchmidtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of HazzardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of MeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003