Legal Opinion
In re Smith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 3, 2004PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 29, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
*745Claimant filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits on November 21, 2001. He was found ineligible to receive benefits for the period December 3, 2001 through April 28, 2002 because he worked part time as a teacher during this time and was not totally unemployed. Following a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge upheld the finding of ineligibility and also found that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of AlmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of ShenmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of LakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of RoperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of Roberson (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re the Claim of HurleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re Claims of SummersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of BaptistaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.