Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Kaganovich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 29, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 5, 1997, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because he was not totally unemployed and that he made willful false statements to obtain benefits. The record discloses that while claimant was receiving benefits he assisted in the operation of his uncle’s grocery store by staffing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SheinfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of GershenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of DonaghyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of ShenmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. In re the Claim of BerzonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. In re the Claim of DobbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. In re the Claim of O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API