Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Holmes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 17, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 18, 2002, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding claimant ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed on various days during the time she was receiving benefits (see Matter of Shenman [Commissioner of Labor], 297 AD2d 852 [2002]). The record establishes that, *576while claimant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ShenmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re the Claim of BerzonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of OlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of ZegelboneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API