In re the Claim of Schmidt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 29, 2002, which, inter aha, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.
After she was laid off from her job as a production supervisor, claimant applied for and received unemployment insurance benefits. The Department of Labor subsequently found her ineligible to receive benefits during the period October 8, 2001 through January 20, 2002 because she was an officer of a corporation and, therefore, was not totally unemployed during that time.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Claim of HalperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of McHughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of ShenmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of BelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of De MartinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Claim of RestivoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of RozestratenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re SingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of WhylieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of SarubbiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.