Legal Opinion
State v. Prater
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 12, 2010No. 08A02-0904-CR-309PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Pursuant to Indiana Code Section 35-38-4-2(8), the State appeals the trial court's order granting Dustin Prater's Motion to Correct Error. The State raises a single issue for our review, namely, whether Indiana Code Section 35-48-4-14.5(c) requires an individual in possession of anhydrous ammonia have the personal "intent to manufacture methamphetamine or amphetamine" in order to commit a Class D felony under that statute.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts are not in dispute. On May 16, 2008, Derrick German and Prater stole anbydrous…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Curley v. Lake County Board of Elections & RegistrationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Hevner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Lea v. LeaIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Showalter v. Town of ThorntownIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Indiana Pesticide Review Board v. Black Diamond Pest & Termite Control, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009
3Cited by35 opinions
- Jessica Kishpaugh v. John Odegard and Miriam OdegardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- David Holbert v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Clark County Drainage Board and Clark County Board of Commissioners v. Robert IsgriggIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- T.D. v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Fight Against Brownsburg Annexation v. Town of Brownsburg, IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.