Legal Opinion

Hevner v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 2010No. 27S02-1001-CR-5PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUCKER, Justice.

We consider a claim that the Indiana Sex Offender Registration Act ("the Act") constitutes retroactive punishment forbidden by the Ex Post Facto Clause contained in the Indiana Constitution because it requires the defendant to register as a sex offender, when the Act contained no such requirement at the time the defendant committed the triggering offense.

Facts and Procedural History

Between October and November of 2005, Indiana resident Gary M. Hevner downloaded on his computer a number of sexually graphic files depicting children. As a consequence, on April 28, 2006, the State…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. NobleArizona Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bleeke v. LemmonIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Lemmon v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. PraterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Andre Gonzalez v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Thomas H. Andrews v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API