Legal Opinion
Showalter v. Town of Thorntown
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 12, 2009No. 06A01-0805-CV-211PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Stuart and Nancy Showalter appeal from the trial court's order that they pay the attorneys' fees incurred by the Town of Thorntown ("Thorntown") in Thorn-town's enforcement of various ordinances against the Showalters. The Showalters raise a single issue for our review, which we restate as whether they preserved their appeal of the trial court's order that they pay Thorntown's attorneys' fees.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts are not disputed on appeal. As the trial court specially found in its April 3rd, 2008, order:
6. At all times…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- GKC Indiana Theatres, Inc. v. Elk Retail Investors, LLC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. NickolickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Bielat v. FOLTAIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lee Travis Griffin v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. PraterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Saral Reed and Durham School Services, Inc. v. Richard BethelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- County of Lake and the Lake County Plan Commission v. Alan J. Pahl and Roderick PahlIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Eric Cox and Pea Cocks Corp. d/b/a Cox's Pub v. Mayerstein-Burnell Co., Inc. d/b/a MBAH Insurance and Jeff CluteIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.