Clark County Drainage Board and Clark County Board of Commissioners v. Robert Isgrigg
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
NAJAM, Judge.
[1-3] Robert Isgrigg files a petition for rehearing from our opinion in which we affirmed in part and reversed in part the trial court’s entry of summary judgment for Isgrigg. See Clark County Drainage Bd. v. Isgrigg, 963 N.E.2d 9 (Ind.Ct.App. 2012) (“Clark County I ”). In his petition, Isgrigg contends that our conclusion that the Sunset Hills project did not involve a regulated drain is erroneous for four reasons, two of which we consider on rehearing. 1 For the reasons discussed below, neither of Isgrigg’s assertions on rehearing are meritorious. We affirm…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. PraterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- VAN PROOYEN BUILDERS, INC. v. LambertIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Carey v. HaddockIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Clark County Drainage Board v. IsgriggIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
3Cited by14 opinions
- Michael Kent Smith v. Thomas L. Taulman, IIIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Indiana Insurance Guaranty Association v. Carlos A. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Allen County Public Library v. Shambaugh & Son, L.P., Hamilton Hunter Builders, Inc., W.A. Sheets & Sons, Inc., and MSKTD & Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- James T. Mitchell v. 10th And The Bypass, LLC, and Elway, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- ESPN, Inc. and Paula Lavigne v. University of Notre Dame Security Police Dept., a Dept. of the University of Notre Dame du LacIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.