Legal Opinion
Floor v. Mitchell
Utah Supreme Court
Decided February 11, 1935No. 5413PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOFFAT, Justice.
The action herein is brought upon what is referred to as a conditional sale contract to recover a balance alleged to be due thereon with interest and attorney’s fees. The subject-matter of the contract relates to the sale and installation at Parowan, Iron county, Utah, of a “Talking Picture Eepro-ducing Equipment.” The complaint was filed in the district court of the Third judicial district of the state of Utah in and for Salt Lake county.
Among other matters not necessary to set forth fully, it is alleged: That on or about the 15th day of March, 1936, the National Filmfone…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Whitfield v. Garris.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Calloway v. CallowayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- O'Hanion v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
- Roseberry v. Hart-Parr Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Buckle v. Ogden Furniture & Carpet Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Zions First National Bank v. Clark Clinic Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- Jorgensen v. John Clay and Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
- Sil-Flo Corporation v. BowenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Whittier v. EmmetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Reubin v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.