Legal Opinion

Adams v. Minor

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1898No. S. F. No. 1090PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPLICATION for a writ of mandate. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Application for writ of mandate commanding respondent to proceed to the rendition of a decision and judgment in a certain cause now pending in the superior court of Stanislaus county, wherein John Adams (petitioner here)' and others are plaintiffs, and G. R. Stoddard, collector of Modesto Irrigation District, in said county, is defendant, and First National Bank of Los Angeles is intervenor. The facts are to-be found in an agreed statement and in the pleadings, from which it appears; That the action involved the validity of certain bonds issued by the said irrigation district, of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pearce v. AtwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  2. North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co. v. KeyserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. City of Oakland v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Heilbron v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Washington Insurance v. PriceNew York Court of Chancery · 1823

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Moody v. ShuffletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. City of Vallejo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API