Legal Opinion

MAGINN v. City of Glendale

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1999No. B122738PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.

Introduction

Plaintiffs Christine A. Maginn and the Maginn Revocable Living Trust sued defendant the City of Glendale for inverse condemnation and violation of due process and equal protection, after the city council denied plaintiffs’ application for a tentative parcel map to subdivide real property for the purpose of building a home on the proposed second lot. The trial court dismissed the case after sustaining defendant’s demurrer on statute of limitations grounds. We affirm.

Government Code section 66499.37 provides that any action or proceeding to review a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Elkins v. DerbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Friends of Shingle Springs Interchange, Inc. v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Sprague v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Friends of Riverside's Hills v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Aiuto v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Legacy Group v. City of WascoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API