Legal Opinion
Shipley v. Sugita
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1996No. A073639PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
A.D. Shipley appeals from a judgment of dismissal. He claims his attorney’s alleged misconduct excuses his failure to timely serve his complaint and summons under Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 583.210. We affirm.
Facts
On September 10, 1991, Shipley filed a complaint, in propria persona, for breach of contract against Daijiro Sugita, a citizen and resident of Japan. 2 In October 1991, Sugita’s attorney informed Shipley that service of the complaint and summons would require compliance with “the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Watts v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Carroll v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1982
- Barrington v. A. H. Robins Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Orange Empire National Bank v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Yeap v. LeakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Inversiones Papaluchi S.A.S. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- TORREY HILLS COMMUNITY COALITION v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Crane v. DolihiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Inversiones Papaluchi S.A.S. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.