Legal Opinion
Brunson v. Bayer Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 27, 2002No. 3:01CV353(JBA)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruling on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #47]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Audrey Brunson’s claims against her former employer, Bayer Corporation, of Title VII sex and race discrimination, retaliation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and negligent supervision, are challenged on motion for summary judgment by Bayer. Bayer’s motion is denied as to Brunson’s sex discrimination and negligent supervision claims and granted as to the remainder of her claims.
I. Factual Background 1
A. Bayer’s Policies and Procedures with Regard to…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pecoraro v. New Haven RegisterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Rieger v. Orlor, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Copeland v. Home & Community Health Services, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Presley v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Antonopoulos v. ZitnayDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.