Legal Opinion
Rieger v. Orlor, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 29, 2006No. 3-.04CV244 (JBA)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. # 55]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Maureen Rieger instituted this action seeking redress for alleged violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. 621 et seq., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act (“CFEPA”), Conn. Gen.Stat. §§ 46a-60, and for negligent infliction of emotional distress. Her claims are based on allegations of defendants’…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Laface v. E. Suffolk BocesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Jenkins v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Morris v. David Lerner AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Hawkins v. County of Oneida, NYDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2007
- Ceslik v. Miller Ford, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.