Legal Opinion
Pecoraro v. New Haven Register
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 26, 2004No. 3:04CV0017(WWE)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Counts Seven and Eleven [Doc. # 7]
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., defendant, New Haven Register, has moved to dismiss counts seven and eleven of plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted [Doc. # 7]. Plaintiff responded to this mo tion by filing an amended complaint with additional factual allegations, which defendant has addressed in its reply memorandum. Accordingly, the Court will treat defendant’s motion to dismiss as addressed to the amended complaint. For the reasons…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Presley v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Delise v. Metro-North RailroadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Rosario v. JC PenneyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Bailey v. Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Bilal Chakas v. Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.