Legal Opinion

Julian v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 2005No. S109735PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

California Insurance Code section 5301 provides that “[a]n insurer is liable for a loss of which a peril insured against was the proximate cause, although a peril not contemplated by the contract may have been a remote cause of the loss; but he is not liable for a loss of which the peril insured against was only a remote cause.” We have construed section 530 as incorporating into California law the efficient proximate cause doctrine, an interpretive rule for first party insurance. (Sabella v. Wisler (1963) 59 Cal.2d 21, 31-33 [27 Cal.Rptr. 689, 377 P.2d 889] (Sabella).)…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Villella v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Mudpie, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Pyramid Technologies, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Leonard v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  4. Century Surety Co. v. PolissoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Aleman v. Airtouch CellularCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API