Legal Opinion

Villella v. Public Employees Mutual Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1986No. 52041-1PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

This case concerns questions of coverage under two homeowners insurance policies. In regard to the first policy we hold that the insured did not sustain a covered loss during the effective coverage period. In regard to the second homeowners policy we hold that questions of fact exist concerning whether the policy had taken effect at the time of loss and whether an insured peril was the efficient proximate cause of the loss. The trial court's grant of summary judgment for the insurer is reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings to be conducted in accordance with this opinion.

Facts

I…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Remmer v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Safeco Insurance Co. Of America v. William GuytonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Leingang v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API