Aleman v. Airtouch Cellular

*562Opinion

BOREN, P. J.

Two members of a putative class—Daniel Krofta and Mary Katz (appellants)—appeal from a trial court order granting summary judgment against them. In this opinion, we examine the application of two provisions from Industrial Welfare Commission wage order No. 4-2001 (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 11040).

First, we find that appellant Krofta was not entitled to receive “reporting time pay”1 for attending meetings at work, because all the meetings were scheduled and appellant worked at least half the scheduled time. Second, we find that appellant Krofta was not owed additional…