Legal Opinion

Gorney v. Meaney

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 31, 2007No. 2 CA-CV 2006-0075PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiff/appellant Dale Gorney appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Dr. John Meaney and Rin-con Orthopedic Associates, P.C. (“Meaney”) after finding Gorney had not complied with the expert witness requirements of A.R.S. § 12-2603. On appeal, Gorney argues the court misinterpreted the requirements of § 12-2603 and improperly granted summary judgment. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶ 2 On appeal from a summary judgment, we view the evidence and all legitimate inferences therefrom in the fight most favorable to the party…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hubbard Ex Rel. Hubbard v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  2. Duncan v. Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Hales v. PittmanArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Shetter v. RochelleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Dressler v. MorrisonArizona Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. White v. LeimbachOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Ryan v. San Francisco Peaks Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. Sanchez v. Old Pueblo Anesthesia, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API