Gorney v. Meaney
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Judge.
¶ 1 Plaintiff/appellant Dale Gorney appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Dr. John Meaney and Rin-con Orthopedic Associates, P.C. (“Meaney”) after finding Gorney had not complied with the expert witness requirements of A.R.S. § 12-2603. On appeal, Gorney argues the court misinterpreted the requirements of § 12-2603 and improperly granted summary judgment. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 On appeal from a summary judgment, we view the evidence and all legitimate inferences therefrom in the fight most favorable to the party…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hubbard Ex Rel. Hubbard v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Duncan v. Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Hales v. PittmanArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Shetter v. RochelleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Dressler v. MorrisonArizona Supreme Court · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- White v. LeimbachOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Ryan v. San Francisco Peaks Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Sanchez v. Old Pueblo Anesthesia, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.