Legal Opinion
Carlson v. Sala Architects, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 5, 2007No. A06-691PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHUMAKER, Judge.
In this dispute between architects and their clients, the respondents claim that they hired the appellant to design a particular style home for them, that they paid approximately $292,000 for the appellant’s architectural services, and that the appellant failed to properly perform as agreed.
After denying the appellant’s motion for summary judgment, the district court, sua sponte, awarded summary judgment to the respondents on the ground that the appellant was professionally negligent in holding out as licensed the unlicensed project architect. The court then ordered…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Donnay v. BoulwareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Toombs v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Damon v. GroteboerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Ransom v. VFS, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Swenson v. BenderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.