Legal Opinion

Howard v. Robertson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 26, 1992No. 10340PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.

The plaintiff, Dorothea K. Howard, appeals from the trial court’s decision rendering summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Malcom D. Robertson. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment because (1) the filing and the service of an application for prejudgment remedy constitutes notice satisfying the statute of limitations, (2) the defendant admitted that he had notice of the plaintiff’s claim and had allegedly received a signed complaint prior to the expiration of the earliest possible date for the statute of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lacasse v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Hillman v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Pacelli Bros. Transportation, Inc. v. PacelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Consolidated Motor Lines, Inc. v. M & M Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  5. Cummings & Lockwood v. GrayConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Raynor v. Hickock Realty Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. Roberto v. Honeywell, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Slekis v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
  4. Rosenberg v. CastanedaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. DunicanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API