Legal Opinion
Roberto v. Honeywell, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 15, 1994No. 11705PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
In this negligence action, the plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered on a jury verdict in favor of the defendants. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) granted the defendants’ request to amend their answer, and (2) applied Practice Book § 220 (D)1 to her offer of a rebuttal expert witness.
*621The following facts are relevant to this appeal. On October 7,1988, a one car collision occurred in Glastonbury. The plaintiff, Stacia L. Roberto, and the defendant, Shannon Garrett, were occupants of the motor vehicle. 2
On August 15, 1990, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Knock v. KnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Rokus v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Slifkin v. Condec Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Caccavale v. Hospital of St. RaphaelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Schilberg Integrated Metals Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Girard v. WeissConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Pie Plate, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Conway v. American Excavating, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Roberto v. Honeywell, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.