American Equitable Assurance Co. v. Newman
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:
Defendant Fidelity-Phenix Insurance Company, hereinafter called Fidelity Company, has appealed from a judgment and from two special orders entered after judgment. One order overruled a motion to vacate the judgment, and the other denied a motion excepting to certain findings. No useful purpose would be served in considering the propriety of the orders appealed from in the view which we take on the appeal from the judgment.
The controversy arises out of the following facts:
On April 3, 1949, defendants, Jay D. Yan Houten and Helen L. Yan Houten, husband and wife, entered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Alexander v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Nelson v. Nelson Neal Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Pearson Mfg. Co. v. Pittsburgh Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Brown v. Northwestern Mutual Fire Assn.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Howarth v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Madison Fork Ranch v. L & B Lodge Pole Timber ProductsMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Watson v. SeekinsMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. Walter B. Hannah, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Marbach v. GnadlAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.