Legal Opinion

Pearson Mfg. Co. v. Pittsburgh Steamboat Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1932No. Appeal, 226PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

The question before us is: What parties are entitled to insurance money paid to the receiver of an insolvent corporation for the fire loss of the corporation’s principal asset, a certain excursion boat called “Greater Pittsburgh?” The respective claimants are the corporation’s general creditors and the holders of a mortgage on the vessel.

Defendant company, incorporated in 1929, conducted a carrying trade on rivers in the vicinity of Pittsburgh. Its business was unprofitable. Within a year of incorporation it became heavily indebted to some of its officers and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Brothers v. Girard National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Peoples Street Ry. Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Northumberland County Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Tr. Co. of Pbg. v. HarkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Alexander v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. United Security Trust Company CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Sovereign Bank v. SchwabCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Gordon v. Hartford Sterling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API