Legal Opinion
Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. Walter B. Hannah, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided June 6, 1969PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Judge.
The controversy on this appeal involves the liability of two insurance companies growing out of policies issued by each on the same property but to the holders of different interests, covering loss by fire and other casualties not material here. In order to simplify a statement o'f the case we shall by-pass some of the inconsequential details.
Twin City Fire Insurance Company (hereinafter Twin City) issued a policy of insurance to Harry and Dorothy Kinker (hereinafter Kinker) covering fire loss on a dwelling house in South Shore, Kentucky. The limit of liability was $5,000.
Thereafte…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carpenter v. Providence Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Howell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Frontier Mortgage Corp. v. HeftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Home Ins. v. KoobCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Stewart v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Farm General Insurance v. StewartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Estes v. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
- Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
- Kirkland v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.