Legal Opinion

Howarth v. First National Bank of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1979No. 3762PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINO WITZ, Justice.

This is the third time this case has come before us for consideration of appellant Ho-warth’s claim for damages arising out of the breach of an oral contract by the First National Bank of Anchorage. According to Howarth, the contract obligated the bank to bear responsibility for seeing that insurance was procured for certain property which Howarth had contracted to sell to a third party, Progressive Enterprises, Inc. Ho-warth had executed an assignment to the bank of “all of his right, title, and interest in, and all moneys now due or to become due to him” from the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Holiday Inns of America, Inc. v. PeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Howarth v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Otis Elevator Company v. McLaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Dwelley v. ChesterfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Brady v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Charleswell v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2004
  5. State v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API