Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Lee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 11, 1913No. 2694PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from District Court, McCurtain County; T. Q. Carr, Special Judge. Action by W. T. Lee against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company to recover damages for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant'brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

On July 28, 1908, the plaintiff below, W. T. Lee, accompanied his mother-in-law, Mrs. A. C. Cabbler, an aged and infirm lady, to defendant’s depot at Haworth, Olda., for the purpose of assisting her to take the train to Hugo, Olcla.; he purchased her ticket and, when the train arrived, assisted her in entering the car and entered thereon himself, carrying two pieces of hand baggage. After having secured a seat for Mrs. Cabbler and deposited her baggage, he started to leave the train, which by that time had started; he claims that as he was in the act of getting off the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Quinlan v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Yarnell v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Hurt v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  4. Railway Co. v. LawtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  5. Faurot v. Oklahoma Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Lisle v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Abbott v. DingusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. St. Louis & S. F. R. v. DobynsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API