Legal Opinion

Abbott v. Dingus

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 17, 1914No. 3940PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from District Court, Cleveland County; Action by Rebecca Dingus against Charles E. Abbott and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER-, C.

This is a suit brought by Rebecca Dingus, as plaintiff below, against plaintiff in error, as defendants, to recover damages for personal injuries and the de struction of a carriage caused by a runaway team belonging to defendants. The cause was tried to a jury, and a verdict returned in plaintiff’s favor for the sum of $235. The defendants below, feeling aggrieved, have brought the case here for review, and argue for a reversal, three propositions: First, the sufficiency of the petition; second, the sufficiency of the evidence; and third, the giving of certain…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Moore v. First Nat. Bank of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. McIntireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Minnetonka Oil Co. v. HavilandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. First Bank of Texola v. TerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Ft. Smith & W. R. Co. v. KnottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. First Nat. Bank of Tecumseh v. HarkeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. BallardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API