Legal Opinion

Lisle v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 24, 1916No. 4785PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; Edward Howes Oldfield, Judge. Action by E. X. Anderson against E. M. Lisle and C. M. Dunning, doing business as E. M. Lisle & Oo., to recover damages for personal injury. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BROWN, C.

The plaintiffs in error will be hereinafter called the defendants, and the defendants in error will be hereinafter called the plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court.

The school district at Mountain View, Okla., on the 14th day of July. 1909, entered into two contracts, one for the construction of a school building and one for the installation of a heating and ventilating system in said building. The defendants had the contract for the construction of said building, and were to furnish all material and do all the work necessary to a complete…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Devlin v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Ellis v. EssonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  4. People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. McIntireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Lowery v. Echostar Satellite Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Keel v. Titan Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Rose v. Sapulpa Rural Water Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API