Newbury v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson
¶1 Gerald Newbury filed a complaint for declaratory relief seeking to have certain provisions in his automobile insurance policies declared void as against public policy and asking that State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. (State Farm) be required to pay outstanding medical expenses. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The District Court for the Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County, granted State Farm’s Motion for Summary Judgment and denied Newbury’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Newbury appeals. We affirm.
¶2 Newbury raises three issues on appeal:
¶3 1. Whether the workers’…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Stutzman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Montana Petroleum Tank Release Compensation Board v. Crumleys, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
- Hardy v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
- Wellcome v. Home InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Fisher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Bailey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Monroe v. COGSWELL AGENCYMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Winter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2014
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.