Legal Opinion

Treichel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1997No. 96-028PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

Petitioner Carolyn Treichel (Carolyn) brought this action against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) seeking a ruling that Carolyn’s claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress is not subject to the “Each Person” policy limit applicable to her husband’s claim. The District Court for the Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County, granted Carolyn’s Motion for Summary Judgment and entered judgment in her favor. State Farm appeals. We affirm.

The sole issue we address on appeal is whether the “Each Person” or the “Each Accident” limits of liability set out and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bruner v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Motarie v. Northern Montana Joint Refuse Disposal DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sacco v. High Country Independent Press, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Mead v. M.S.B., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Johnson v. Supersave Markets, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Stutzman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FreyerMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Watters v. Guaranty National InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Joyce v. GarnaasMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Thomas v. Northwestern National InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1998

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API