Legal Opinion

Lohman v. Lohman

California Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1946No. L. A. 19299PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

At the time of the death of Theodore G. Lohman, he had not paid the amounts specified in a property settlement agreement whose provisions were approved by the court and included in both the interlocutory and the final decree of divorce obtained by Jennie A. Lohman. His second wife, Zalla Lohman, as the executrix of his estate, successfully resisted a motion to enforce the decree, and the appeal is from the order denying relief.

The interlocutory decree of divorce was entered April 16, 1929. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, it required the immediate payment of $5,500 and an…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gaston v. GastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Reher v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. McClenahan v. KeyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Butcher v. BrouwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Savage v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Tammen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Messenger v. MessengerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Freeman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. CarusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Wade v. Markwell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API