Snipes v. City of Bakersfield
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON (P. D ), J.
In this appeal we conclude that actions seeking redress for employment discrimination pursuant to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) are not subject to the claim-presentation requirements of the Tort Claims Act (Gov. Code, § 810 et seq.). Accordingly, we reverse a judgment of dismissal entered after respondents’ demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend.
The complaint for damages and injunctive relief alleges that appellant, who is black, applied for employment as a police officer with the Bakersfield…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Williams v. HorvathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Minsky v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Hollon v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Elias v. San Bernardino County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Mabe v. San Bernardino CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Aguilar v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.