Legal Opinion

Dooly v. Eastman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1902No. 3799PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Walla Walla County.— Hon.'Thomas IT. Brents, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

— Appellant brought this action against the respondents, Thomas R. Eastman, Patrick Russell, Mary *565A. Russell, and the children of said Patrick and Mary A. Russell, to subject the northwest quarter of section 1, township 7 north, of range 35 E., W. M., situate in Walla Walla county, to the lien of a deficiency judgment which he had theretofore obtained against the respondents Patrick Russell and Mary A. Russell, in the superior court of Walla Walla county.

The facts, as alleged in the amended complaint, are as follows: That the defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Mascarel v. RaffourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  3. McArthur v. MageeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. O'Dougherty v. . Remington Paper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. People v. LundinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Bodner v. BricknerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. Tacoma Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Safety Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Citizens National Bank v. AbbottWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. In re City of New York to Acquire Title to East Twenty-Ninth StreetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API