Tacoma Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Safety Investment Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Askren, J., entered March 4, 1922, in favor of the plaintiff as to one tract of land, hut denying foreclosure as to a deficiency judgment upon the other tract, in an action to foreclose a mortgage.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, C. J.
The purpose of this action was to foreclose two mortgages upon one tract of land. The trial resulted in a judgment of foreclosure as to one and the denial of foreclosure as to the other. Prom this judgment, the plaintiff appeals.
The faets are not in dispute, and, so far as is necessary to present the question to he determined, may be summarized as follows: On September 7, 1916, the Safety Investment Company gave its note to the appel*482lant, the Tacoma Savings Bank & Trust Company, for the sum of $15,000, due one year after date, and to secure the payment of the note, executed a mortgage upon…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commercial National Bank v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- McKinney v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Dooly v. EastmanWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Citizens National Bank v. AbbottWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Conklin v. StackflethSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dupuy v. Western State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Michigan National Bank v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- U.S. Bank v. HurseyWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Layden v. . LaydenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Long v. W. P. Devereux Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.