People v. Lundin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial, and from an order denying a motion in arrest of judgment. Edward A. Belcher, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
Defendant was charged by information with the crime of forgery, alleged to have been committed at the city and county of San Francisco, on or about December 18, 1895. To the information defendant pleaded: 1. Not guilty; 2. Once in jeopardy; 3. Former acquittal.
Upon the trial the defendant was found guilty as charged. The jury also found for the “people on former pleas” of once in jeopardy and former acquittal.
Thereupon judgment was entered that defendant be punished by imprisonment in the state prison of the state of California at San Quentin for the term of four years.
Defendant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. WhitemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by17 opinions
- Taylor v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- People v. LundinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. SwanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- United States v. RynoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.