Legal Opinion
Polomski v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 21, 1996No. 140, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KARWACKI, Judge.
In this case, we construe Maryland Code (1991 Repl.Vol., 1996 Cum.Supp.), § 9—503(d)(2) of the Labor and Employment Article, 1 the so-called “offset provision” of § 9-503 of the Maryland Workers’ Compensation Act (hereinafter “Workers’ Compensation Act” or “the Act”). Specifically, we are asked the narrow question of whether § 9-503(d)(2) requires the reduction of workers’ compensation benefits for a disability caused by an occupational disease paid to a retired fire fighter who is also receiving retirement benefits under a service pension plan. We shall hold that it does not…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Mazor v. State, Dep't of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Rose v. Fox Pool Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Frank v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Johnson v. Mayor & City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Bd. of County Commissioners of Garrett Cty. v. Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Breitenbach v. N.B. Handy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Design Kitchen and Baths v. LagosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.