Legal Opinion

Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. Francks

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 12, 1925PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.

The appeal is from a judgment of $22,500, recovered against the appellant for the benefit of .a young girl, who bad contracted phosphorous poisoning while employed in the making of fireworks for the appellant. The company’s pleas were to the effect (1) /that it was an employer engaged in an • extra-hazardous employment within the Maryland Workmen’s Compensation Act, and had secured compensation to its employees by insurance in conformity with the act in an author-, ized assurance carrier; and (2) that the girl was its servant at the time she sustained the injury complained of which arose out…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Peet v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Raymond v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Alexander v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  5. Solvuca v. Ryan & Reilly Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Commercial Union Insurance v. Porter Hayden Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Canadian Radium & Uranium Corp. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Webb v. New Mexico Pub. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API