Legal Opinion

Bd. of County Commissioners of Garrett Cty. v. Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 19, 1997No. 67, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARWACKI, Judge.

Maryland Code (1991 Repl.Vol.), Article 78, § 28A, 1 otherwise known as Maryland’s “Miss Utility Act,” (“Miss Utility” or “the Act”) was enacted to protect the property of public service companies and other entities from various traumas in order to safeguard the public safety, health, and welfare. This case requires us to construe that Act.

I

Sometime in 1967, the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company (“C & P”) 2 buried two separate underground telephone cables in the Orendorf and Mosser Road areas of Garrett County, Maryland (“the County”). At the time, no written agreement…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Faya v. AlmarazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Rosenblatt v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Morris v. Osmose Wood PreservingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Molesworth v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Pittway Corp. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Brooks v. Lewin Realty III, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API