Conde v. Dreisam Gold Mining Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County, and from an order denying a new trial. George W. Nicol, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Foreclosure of mortgage executed by defendant company to ‘plaintiffs, the Condes and Leonardini, deceased, in his lifetime, to secure the payment of a certain promissory note for the sum of $9,000, payable to them and made by defendant company.
Plaintiffs had judgment, from which and from the order denying their motion for new trial defendants appeal.
The court found the following facts: That on May 24, 1899, defendant company executed the note and mortgage in question, payable thirty days after date. James E. Conde’s intestate died December 1, 1900, and on March 15, 1902, said Conde was duly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Redfield v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Smith v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Comptoir D'Escompte De Paris v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Blair & Hoge v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
- Denigan v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Zinn v. Fred R. Bright Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- B. & W. Engineering Co. v. BeamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Borst v. RuffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Rohrbach v. HammillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Watson v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.