Legal Opinion

Borst v. Ruff

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 19, 1950PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.

For some time prior to February 15, 1950, the defendant in error, referred to herein as the tenant, occupied premises in New Haven under a month-to-month lease from the plaintiff in error, referred to herein as the landlord. The rent was $35, payable in advance on the fifteenth day of each month. On February 18, the tenant mailed a check to the landlord for the rent due February 15. Payment was refused by the bank because of insufficient funds. The tenant mailed another check for the same purpose on February 23. This was likewise dishonored. The landlord then retained an attorney to recover…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thompson v. CoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  2. Camp v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
  3. Hartford Wheel Club v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  4. Alexiou v. Bridgeport-Peoples' Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Tseka v. ScherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Fellows v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Spear-Newman, Inc. v. Modern Floors CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  4. Zitomer v. PalmerConnecticut Superior Court · 1982
  5. Kligerman v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API