Blair & Hoge v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Virginia
The case is fully stated by Judge Burks in his opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.
This case is before us ou a writ of supersedeas awarded by one of the judges of this court to a judgment of the circuit court of the city of Richmond,, rendered in an action of assumpsit instituted in said circuit court by the plaintiffs in error (Blair & Hoge) for the benefit of Thomas P. Hoge, against the defendant in error, Nathaniel M. Wilson.
The declaration contains the common counts only, to-wit, for goods sold and delivered, for work and labor done, account stated, and the usual money counts.
The bill of particulars filed with the declaration is an account of Blair & Hoge against Wilson…
2Cited by33 opinions
- Kimball & Fink v. Friend's Adm' rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- First National Bank of Wellsburg v. KimberlandsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
- Comptoir D'Escompte De Paris v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Harris v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. MedleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.