Legal Opinion

Blair & Hoge v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 15, 1877PublishedCited by 33 opinions

The case is fully stated by Judge Burks in his opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.

This case is before us ou a writ of supersedeas awarded by one of the judges of this court to a judgment of the circuit court of the city of Richmond,, rendered in an action of assumpsit instituted in said circuit court by the plaintiffs in error (Blair & Hoge) for the benefit of Thomas P. Hoge, against the defendant in error, Nathaniel M. Wilson.

The declaration contains the common counts only, to-wit, for goods sold and delivered, for work and labor done, account stated, and the usual money counts.

The bill of particulars filed with the declaration is an account of Blair & Hoge against Wilson…

2Cited by33 opinions

  1. Kimball & Fink v. Friend's Adm' rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  2. First National Bank of Wellsburg v. KimberlandsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Comptoir D'Escompte De Paris v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Harris v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  5. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. MedleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1881

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API