Legal Opinion

Bell v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1904No. L.A. No. 1265PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

As originally brought, this action was in ejectment to recover a tract of land in Santa Barbara County over which the railroad of the defendant is constructed and operated, and for damages for the alleged trespass committed in entering thereon, and for the value of the rents, issues, and profits.

Defendant answered denying the material allegations of the complaint, and set up, in justification of its entry, possession, and use, a written agreement on the part of the plaintiff to convey to it, as a right of way for its railroad, a part of the premises described in the complaint, and of which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Reclamation District No. 556 v. ThisbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Spires v. UrbahnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Harron v. HarronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Thompson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Greenstone v. Claretian Theological SeminaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Pigeon v. W. P. Fuller & Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Gray v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Marin Water & Power Co. v. Town of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Tate v. Saratoga Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API